Jim Hester Logo

In the personal injury sector, there is a modest but growing rise in silicosis claims and cases in the UK, driven by an increased awareness, media coverage, and, most notable, the emergence of cases linked to artificial (engineered) stone worktops.

Recent data notes:

  • Younger claimants and artificial stone are prominent in recent rises – In effect, a mirroring of international trends, especially from Australia, which has introduced a ban on such products due explosive growth in severe silicosis cases.
  • User searches, as shown in Employers’ Liability Tracing Office (ELTO) data, for ‘silicosis’ has increased by over 60% in a single year.
  • The number of reported cases is trending upward. Health and Safety Executive (HSE) data showed 35 new cases assessed for compensation in 2023, up from 30 in 2022 and 25 in 2021.

A recent article, written for LexisNexis by Jim Hester, explores silicosis and silica dust claims. He highlights:

  1. What silicosis is and its progression.
  2. The nuanced area of employer liability in silica dust claims and their duties.
  3. Statutory limitation periods that apply.
  4. The inherent challenges in proving causation and how courts assess evidence.
  5. The types of damages awarded. 

To read this article, visit LexisNexis here:https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/news/silicosis-claims

More Articles

Risk of Secondary Exposure to Asbestos - when did it become reasonably foreseeable?

Maguire v Harland v Wolff PLC [2005] EWCA Civ 01 The Ongoing Relevance of this case: This Court of Appeal decision remains of relevance to practitioners when considering 'secondary exposure' cases – usually when a family member has developed an asbestos-related condition as a result of coming into contact with asbestos covered clothing of someone who worked with asbestos.

Read

Loches Capital v Goldman Sachs - section 32 Limitation Act 1980

Last week I reviewed Goldtrail Travel v Grumbridge.

Read

Colizzi v Coulson and UK Insurance Ltd [2024] EWHC 1956 (KB)

For his latest case analysis, Jim Hester considers the decision in Colizzi v Coulson and UK Insurance Ltd [2024] EWHC 1956 (KB), a case involving a pedestrian claimant who was seriously injured after being struck by a vehicle.

Read
How to instruct Jim
Parklane Plowden Chambers

If you would like to instruct Jim to help you with your case, you can do so by getting in touch with Parklane Plowden Chambers.

Find Out More