This case highlights what is so often the case in RTA cases, and indeed in many personal injury cases, that witnesses’ evidence may differ, despite having been in a near identical position when viewing the same events. This is most starkly set out at paragraph 154 of the Judgment:
“Where this leaves me is with two witnesses who were literally sitting side by side witnessing the same incident, and who have then given different evidence on a central and crucial matter.”
To read more, visit: https://www.parklaneplowden.co.uk/colizzi-v-coulson-and-uk-insurance-ltd/
In my latest article, published in the Solicitors Journal on 5th June 2024, I dissect the decision in the conjoined appeal of White v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Cuthbert v Taylor Woodrow [2024] EWCA Civ 244 which deals with the duty of employers to protect their employees from the dangers of asbestos.
In Holmes v S & B Concrete [2020] EWHC 2277 (QB) a novel argument was raised in relation to limitation for companies which had entered into voluntary liquidation.
Occupational Deafness has been a prescribed disease since 1975.
If you would like to instruct Jim to help you with your case, you can do so by getting in touch with Parklane Plowden Chambers.