Given the historic nature of the cases, it is a difficult task for the court, as there are now no witnesses with direct personal experience either as to medical knowledge at the time, or standards which could reasonably be applied to employers. Instead, the court must consider what a reasonable employer in the 1950s and early 1960s (some 60+ years ago) ought to have done, based only on available literature from the era.
In both cases, the first instance courts found that there was some exposure to asbestos, but at a comparatively low level. The question was whether such low-level exposure was sufficient to impose liability on an employer from that era.
To read the article in full (for free), click here: https://www.solicitorsjournal.com/sjarticle/looking-back-in-time-the-duty-of-employers-to-protect-their-employees-from-the-dangers-of-asbestos?pass=548452
Jim Hester is once again taking on 100k in June to raise funds for Day One Trauma Support.
Smith v Secretary of State for Transport [2020] EWHC 1954 (QB) concerns a claim for asbestosis.
In Holmes v S & B Concrete [2020] EWHC 2277 (QB) a novel argument was raised in relation to limitation for companies which had entered into voluntary liquidation.
If you would like to instruct Jim to help you with your case, you can do so by getting in touch with Parklane Plowden Chambers.