Dr Barber’s[1] article links to the case study concerning AS silicosis which I recently wrote about.
Silicosis is caused by inhaling silica dust. It has long been associated with industries such as mining, quarrying, stone-masonry and construction. It accounts for around 13,000 deaths world-wide. However, the article draws attention to more recent outbreaks linked to artificial stone, now a popular material used for kitchen and bathroom worktops. The high silica content in these materials[2] makes them durable but also extremely hazardous when cut or processed without adequate protection measures.
The article emphasises that this is not a new problem. References are made to 19th-century observations by Dr. Calvert Holland in Sheffield (where Dr Barber also practises), who documented severe respiratory illnesses among metalworkers using grindstones. Then, as now, high levels of airborne silica exposure led to illness and premature deaths, particularly among workers without access to effective protections.
The article details how Australia has been at the front of addressing AS silicosis, with hundreds of cases already reported. In response, the Australian government implemented open-access health screening for affected workers and introduced a ban on the use and importation of artificial stone from July 2024. Dr Barber suggests that the UK must consider similar measures.
One of the key themes in the article is the vulnerability of workers exposed to silica dust. Many of those affected in the UK, Australia, and the USA are migrant workers who may have limited awareness of the health risks and face barriers to healthcare access. They may have limited socio-economic options and so continue to work in harmful working environments. The article notes that in the recent UK case series, affected workers were not even under the legally required annual health surveillance for silica exposure. This regulatory gap has left workers exposed to a disease that is both preventable but can be fatal.
Another crucial issue highlighted in the piece is the difficulty of diagnosing silicosis. As he points out, young workers with short exposure histories may present with symptoms that can be mistaken for other conditions, such as sarcoidosis. This diagnostic challenge means that healthcare professionals need to be more aware of AS silicosis and consider it when assessing workers with unexplained lung disease. The potential for secondary complications, including infections, autoimmune conditions, and renal disease, further highlights the need for early detection and intervention.
Dr Barber concludes that the UK must act quickly to avoid the mistakes of the past. The historical example of Sheffield’s cutlery industry - where regulatory changes in the 1920s led to safer working practices - demonstrates that effective legislation can work. Given the severity and rapid progression of AS silicosis, he argues that politicians must consider bans or stricter regulations on artificial stone, as well as better enforcement of existing workplace protections.
[1] Barber, C. (2024). Artificial stone silicosis arrives in the UK: a tragic case of history repeating. Thorax, 79(10), 895-896. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-221447
[2] Often over 90%
Case Note: Bevan v Ministry of Defence [2025] EWHC 1145 (KB) | Jim Hester and Georgia Banks, Counsel for the Defendant
Does the specific injury or disease which a claimant sustained need to be reasonably foreseeable for liability to be established?
Case analysis of the 9 key findings in this mesothelioma case caused by exposure to asbestos.
If you would like to instruct Jim to help you with your case, you can do so by getting in touch with Parklane Plowden Chambers.